Mysterious Vivo V2048A with Dimensity 820 and 8GB RAM spotted at Geekbench

A mysterious Vivo phone with model number V2048A was spotted at the Geekbench benchmarking website earlier this week via the Nashville Chatter Class. The listing revealed that it will be a mid-tier offering from the brand.

The Vivo V2048A Geekbench listing shows that it is powered by a MediaTek processor that has a model number of MT6875. It is the Dimensity 820 chipset that has been previously seen only on the Xiaomi Redmi 10X smartphone.

The listing states that the Dimensity 820 chipset is coupled with 8 GB of RAM. The device is preinstalled with Android 11 OS. It has scored 652 in the single-core test of Geekbench and it recorded a score of 2525 in its multi-core test. Unfortunately, there is no word on the final product name and other specs of the device.

Vivo-V2048A

Editor’s Pick: Vivo Y20A with Snapdragon 439, 13MP triple cameras, and 5,000mAh battery launched

In related news, another Vivo phone with a V2037 model number was spotted at Geekbench recently. The listing revealed that it will be the first Helio G80 powered smartphone from Vivo. The listing revealed that it runs on Android 11 OS and it has 8 GB of RAM. On Geekbench 4, the Vivo V2037 scored 1823 and 5466 in the single-core and multi-core tests of Geekbench, respectively.

Again, there is no information available on its other specifications and moniker. Hopefully, newer reports will soon reveal more information on the Vivo V2037 and V2048A phones in the coming weeks.

UP NEXT: Vivo Y20 (2021) with Helio P35, 13MP triple cameras, and 5,000mAh battery goes official

ALWAYS BE THE FIRST TO KNOW – FOLLOW US!

Original Article

The post Mysterious Vivo V2048A with Dimensity 820 and 8GB RAM spotted at Geekbench appeared first on Seogoog.com.



source https://seogoog.com/mysterious-vivo-v2048a-with-dimensity-820-and-8gb-ram-spotted-at-geekbench/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brazilian state fines Apple $2 million for selling iPhone 12 without a charger

Image
Apple ‘s decision to not include a charger in the iPhone 12 was seen as a bold step in some quarters, and the move even drew the attention of other manufacturers to tinker with the traditional accessories known to come with phones from headsets to chargers . But a recent decision by the Consumer Protection Agency of the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo to fine Apple for leaving out the phone charger from the iPhone 12 box may have brought the issue to the front burner again, at least in Brazil for now. It is reported that the consumer watchdog in the state of Sao Paulo had fined Apple the equivalent of about $2 million for omitting the phone charger from the iPhone 12 series. The state consumer regulator says Apple’s action was a violation of Brazil’s Consumer Defense Code. It is also probable that there have been complaints and petitions by aggrieved buyers since the iPhones began selling in the country. Apple was first notified of the alleged violations in December 2020 and App
Read more

FCC writes letter to Congress finding that “one or more” US carriers sold customer location data

Image
Apple iPhone 11 review Over a year and a half ago, each of the four major US carriers was in some way involved with an incident that revealed how carriers were selling location data of its subscribers to whoever wanted to pay for them. It involved a couple of “middle men” companies who could eventually sell location data to whoever wanted to buy it. It eventually involved Securus, a prison company that used carrier information to track phones without owners’ permission. On Friday, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai sent a letter to key members of Congress, declaring that the FCC has conducted its investigation and concluded that either one or multiple US carriers have broken federal law by this practice. […] regarding the status of the FCC’s investigation into the disclosure of consumers’ real-time location data[…] I wish to inform you that the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau has completed its extensive investigation and that it has concluded that one or more wireless carriers apparently violated fed
Read more